$5 MillionExecutive Severance Pay
$4 MillionWhistleblower Retaliation
$1.5 MillionRetaliation
$1.2 MillionWhistleblower Retaliation
$1.1 MillionAge Discrimination
$1 MillionGender Discrimination
JUSTIA 10 - Badge
Super Lawyers / Claudia A. Rels - Badge
Super Lawyers / Christopher P. Lenzo - Badge
Av Preeminent Peer Rated for High Professional Achievements 2019 - Badge
Av Distinguished Peer Rated for High Professional Achievements 2019 - Badge
Best lawyers / Lawyer of the Year / Claudia A. Reis 2018 - Badge
Best Lawyers - Christopher Lenzo - Lawyer of the year 2022
Best lawyers / Lawyer of the Year / Christopher P. Lenzo - Badge
NELA - Badge
NELANJ - Badge
New Jersey State Bar Association - Badge
NJAJ - Badge
NJ Association of Woman Business Owners - Badge
American Arbitration Association - Badge
New Jersey Women Lawyers - Badge
PALCUS - Badge
Fellows / American Bar Association - Badge
Best Law Firms - Badge
Best Lawyers of the Year 2024 - Badge
Recognized by Best Lawyers 2023 - Badge
Recognized by Best Lawyers 2024 - Badge
Best Law Firms 2024 - Badge

Target Agrees to Pay $2.8 Million to Resolve Hiring Discrimination Charge

On August 24, 2015, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that Target Corporation has agreed to pay $2.8 million to resolve a charge of hiring discrimination. The EEOC found that three assessments formerly used by the company screened out applicants based on race and gender, and one violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Thousands of people were adversely affected by Target’s discriminatory practices, and the money is to be distributed among them.

The Assessment Tests

According to the EEOC, three of the tests used to assess applicants for exempt-level professional positions disproportionately screened out applicants based on race and gender. Because the assessment tests were neither sufficiently job-related nor necessary to the business, they violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Target also used an assessment performed by psychologists. The EEOC found that this qualified as a pre-employment medical examination, and therefore violated the ADA. The ADA prohibits employers from subjecting applicants to medical examinations before making a job offer.

Target no longer uses the assessment tests in question and has agreed not to use them in the future. Target has agreed to take several measures to prevent such problems with its hiring process in the future and to report to the EEOC on the subject annually.

If you believe that you were subjected to discriminatory hiring practices, please call the New Jersey employment discrimination attorneys of Lenzo & Reis, LLC, at (973) 845-9922 or email us today for a free case evaluation.

Client Reviews

At what was supposed to be the highest point in my career suddenly became the most harassing and lowest point of my career and I was passed over for a promotion. Not because the other person was more qualified than I was, but because I followed the law and did the right thing and the people I worked...

John

Chris Lenzo did an outstanding job in my employment discrimination case. He responded to my questions in a timely fashion, provided clear communication through each step of the process, and handled my case in an honest and straight forward manner. Chris’s expertise in employment law along with his...

Sofia

I have worked with Ms. Reis and her firm for the past three years. During the consultation process, you will immediately experience her compassion as she offers suggestions and guides you through the difficult situation you are dealing with. Her attention to detail, timely follow up and candid...

A.M.

Contact Us

  • ContactFormIcon_2x.png Your Career. Your Life. Our Fight.
  • ContactFormIcon_2x.png Employment Attorneys With 45+ Years of Experience!
  • ContactFormIcon_2x.png Experienced Help, Just a Call Away

Fill out the contact form or call us at (973) 845-9922 to schedule your free consultation.