In order to better serve you while concerns over COVID-19 continue we are happy to conduct consultations by phone. Documents can also be reviewed and signed electronically. Please don’t hesitate to contact us with any questions or concerns.

$5 million Executive
Severance Pay
$1.5 million Gender
Discrimination
$1.5 million Retaliation
$1.2 million Whistleblower
Retaliation
$1.1 million Age
Discrimination
$750,000 Employment
Case

Women’s Soccer Team Stakes Its Claim for Equal Pay

Do American Women Receive Equal Pay for Equal Work?

The Equal Pay Act, signed into law in 1963, was designed to level the playing field for men and women by prohibiting gender-based discrimination with respect to the payment of wages. In other words, men and women in the same workplace are required to be given equal pay for equal work. Now, more than 50 years later, a wage gap remains between the sexes.

President Barack Obama tried to move the ball down the field when he signed his first major legislation in January 2009, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. In short, the law extended the time period for claimants to bring pay discrimination claims. Despite the intentions of the Equal Pay Act and Obama’s initiative, some observers argue that women are still paid about 79 cents for every dollar paid to men.

Now, five players on the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team have brought renewed attention to the equal pay debate after they filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission accusing U.S. Soccer Federation of wage discrimination.

U.S. Women’s Soccer Team EEOC Complaint

According to the New York Times, the women bringing the claim contend that they earned 40 percent of what the men’s national team earned last year, even though the women’s team won its third World Cup.

In response, U.S. Soccer argued that the men’s national team produced twice as much revenue and attendance than the women’s team. The soccer governing body also contends that pay for the women’s team was negotiated through collective bargaining and the players insisted on economic security via a salary-based system. The agreement also included severance and injury pay, health benefits and maternity leave. The men’s team, says U.S. Soccer, is paid under what it called a “bonus-centric plan” without the benefits women receive.

Nonetheless, U.S Soccer’s financial reports show that the women’s team is driving revenue – which exceeded 2015 predictions by about $16 million.

“The numbers speak for themselves,” said goalkeeper Hope Solo, one of complainants. “We are the best in the world, have three World Cup championships, four Olympic championships.”

Meanwhile, the men’s team performance has been called mediocre. The complaint also alleges that the women are being shortchanged on bonuses, appearance fees and per diems.

The Equal Pay Act at a Glance

In sum, the Equal Pay Act requires that men and women in the same workplace be given equal pay for equal work. The jobs, moreover, do not have to be identical, but rather “substantially equal” which is a matter of the work involved, not job titles. The law covers all forms of compensation such as salary, overtime pay, bonuses and other benefits and accommodations.

While this case adds to the growing debate over equal treatment of female athletes and the outcome remains unclear at this time, it has also shone a light on the long-standing wage gap between men and women. In the meantime, if you believe you have been the victim of pay discrimination, an experienced employment attorney can help you get the compensation you deserve.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Professional and Knowledgeable Attorney. At what was supposed to be the highest point in my career suddenly became the most harassing and lowest point of my career and I was passed over for a promotion. Not because the other person was more qualified than I was, but because I followed the law and did the right thing and the people I worked for did not like that. After researching several attorneys, my wife and I found Claudia, and the decision to retain her was the best decision we ever made. After explaining our case to Claudia, we found that she was not only extremely professional but a very caring human being. Throughout the entire process of our case, Claudia was there with us every step of the way. She explained every single proceeding that we had to go through and guided us, not only as a professional attorney in and out of court, but personally as a caring and understanding person. Because of her extensive working knowledge of employment and labor laws, Claudia was able to successfully resolve our case. My wife and I will always be extremely grateful for Claudia’s hard work and dedication, and we highly recommend Claudia Reis to anyone seeking an attorney who practices in employment and labor laws." John
★★★★★
"Professionalism, integrity, and determination. Outstanding representation! Chris Lenzo did an outstanding job in my employment discrimination case. He responded to my questions in a timely fashion, provided clear communication through each step of the process, and handled my case in an honest and straight forward manner. Chris’s expertise in employment law along with his hard work ensured justice would prevail in my case and got me the compensation I deserved. Likewise, Chris’s law firm staff was professional, courteous, organized, and effective. I highly recommend Chirs Lenzo’s firm to anyone with an employment legal matter in New Jersey or New York." Sofia
★★★★★
"Remarkable professional. I have worked with Ms. Reis and her firm for the past three years. During the consultation process, you will immediately experience her compassion as she offers suggestions and guides you through the difficult situation you are dealing with. Her attention to detail, timely follow up and candid manner ensured me that I was well-protected and represented. Ms. Reis always went above and beyond to protect me legally. She is a very strong and tough (when necessary) advocate for the individual she represents. Her support staff is equally diligent. I would recommend her without reservation." A.M.